Home What's New About the League Publications Citizens Guide Elections Democracy Links Women's Guide


LWV logo

The League of Women Voters
of New Jersey

a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization whose purpose is to promote political responsibility
through informed and active participation in government

 
1999 BALLOT QUESTION (TRANSPORTATION BONDS)

LWVNJ POSITION

The League of Women Voters, a nonpartisan political organization, takes action on public policy positions established through member agreement. We are political, but we do not support or oppose any political party or any candidate. The League of Women Voters of New Jersey has a long history of taking positions on issues.

"Whatever else you do on November 2nd, be sure to vote NO on the $500 million transportation bond issue," is the message that the League of Women Voters of New Jersey is sending to all eligible voters. The League cited five major reasons why voters should defeat the bond issue:

  • elected leaders disregard for New Jersey citizens' constitutional right to vote on increases in state debt;
  • fiscal irresponsibility of approving $5.6 billion of bonds and increasing the amount of annual borrowing for transportation to $1.5 billion dollars in the current fiscal year;
  • failure of elected representatives to increase taxes to fund the massive increases in borrowing they approved for transportation;
  • elected representatives will use a YES vote to justify increasing the gasoline tax, an increase they knew was needed years earlier; and
  • the lack of any guarantee that the state will actually issue the bonds and carry out the work even if approved

    "Citizens must resoundingly defeat this bond issue to send a message to our elected representatives that we will not allow them to manipulate us into seeming support of their irresponsible actions regarding the funding of capital construction for transportation," said Sandra Matsen, LWVNJ League president. "The New Jersey Constitution gives citizens the right to approve or disapprove increases in state debt by voting on bond issues. Our representatives have scorned this constitutional right by allowing state authorities to issue $5.6 billion in bonds for transportation projects since 1992--without public vote. $1.5 billion of this amount is being bonded this year, three times as much as the amount citizens will see on the ballot."

    "Elected officials have shown a startling lack of fiscal responsibility, not only by increasing the total cost of construction through borrowing, but also by refusing to raise additional tax revenue to fund the costs, even though it was clear several years ago that additional revenue was essential," continued Matsen. The League pointed out that annual borrowing for transportation purposes rose from $272 million in 1992 to $611 million in 1996, and to $1.5 billion in 1999-2000, using both the Transportation Trust Fund and the Economic Development Authority to issue bonds in the latest year. The cost of repaying principal and interest on transportation bonds has ballooned to $9.3 billion, and debt repayments soon will reach half a billion dollars annually, the League reported.

    "If they approve this $500 million bond issue, New Jersey citizens should be aware that elected leaders will use their YES vote as a justification for voting for a tax increase next year," said Matsen. She pointed out that elected representatives, as part of their duties, are responsible for raising adequate tax revenue to provide for essential services, including transportation.

    The League charged that this bond issue has been placed on the ballot this year because the Transportation Trust Fund (TTF) expires in 2000, eliminating the authority and with it the state's major source for borrowing transportation money. The Fund cannot be extended unless and until the administration and legislature approve an increase in some tax, presumably the motor fuels (gasoline) tax, to pay for additional capital spending.

    Proponents of the bond issue are ignoring the $250 million, which will go to the state for unspecified projects and are drumming up support by focusing on the other $250 million for bridge repairs by counties. They are playing up fear of collapse or closing of bridges resulting in traffic bottlenecks.

    The League pointed out that originally the bond issue called for all $500 million to be spent on bridges, but that was changed at the last minute. "This change seriously undermines the state's arguments about the seriousness of the bridge emergency. Why, if bridge conditions are so serious, has the state--having spent over $5 billion in state construction funds and billions more in federal funds--failed to allocate some proportion to address the hazards?" asked the League president.

    Voters also should be aware that passage of this bond issue does not guarantee that the bonds will be issued and the construction undertaken. If approved, the state would have a total of $1.3 billion of voter-approved bonds that have not been issued. State policy is to bond only $300 million annually of voter-approved bonds. Other projects, including many environmental protection projects approved by voters years earlier, could be funded rather than the transportation projects,concluded Matsen.

    Bonding for Transportation Capital Needs

    1992-2000

    1992

    $272 Million

    Transportation Trust Fund (TTF)

    1993

    495

    TTF

    1994

    461

    TTF

    1995

    182

    TTF

    1996

    611

    TTF

    1997

    674

    TTF

    1998

    715

    TTF

    1999

    700

    TTF

    2000

    900

    TTF

    633

    Economic Development Authority

    TOTAL: $5.643 billion

    Debt Service on Transportation Bonds

    Repayment of Principal & Interest

    Existing Debt Service, 1998

    $5,279,952,211

    Anticipated Debt Service on $1.4 Billion for 1999 and 2000

    $2,877,099,250

    Estimated Debt Service on Additional $833 Million in 2000

    $1,191,000,000

    TOTAL

    $9,348,051,461

    This fiscal year, 1999-2000, the state will borrow $1.53 billion for transportation projects without public vote. The Transportation Trust Fund is authorized to borrow (bond) $900 million. It has issued $454 million and is preparing to bond the rest. In addition, the state used the Economic Development Authority to borrow another $633 million for Light Rail Projects in South and North Jersey.

    In 1998, the state reported that debt service on bonds issued by the Transportation Trust Fund and an estimated $1.4 billion in bonds to be issued in 1999 and 2000 totaled $8.157 billion. This estimate does not include an additional $200 million in bonding by TTF-authorized for 2000 and the $633 million bonded by the Economic Development Authority. Using the same ratio of interest to principal used in the state's debt report, 43%, total debt will increase to $9.3 billion for transportation projects alone.

    The state has used money borrowed by the TTF to pay for some salaries and repairs, items that it is reasonable to believe should be paid for from annual tax revenue rather than through bonding

    LWVNJ 10/99




Home What's New About the League Publications Citizens Guide Elections Democracy Links Women's Guide


  © 1997-2005   League of Women Voters of New Jersey. All rights reserved.
View our privacy policy, and contact our webmaster with any questions about this site.